Can police search my car after a DUI arrest? People v. Wallace
I get this question a good deal, whether Police can search your car after a DUI arrest. This 9/7/17 case People v. Wallace gives some thoughts. It’s from the California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dist., 2nd Div.
There are laws as to whether police can search certain areas or containers in your car, and this case case doesn’t deal with that issue. Here, the officer sees the handle of a baton sticking out from a seat. At any rate, the issue is whether a car search not within police policy violates 4th Amendment. Spoiler: it violates the Constitution.
So, one officer pulls Defendant over for false tabs, and another officer (the Searching Officer) comes to the scene to assist. Both officers get Defendant out of his car and arrest him (Police also knew Defendant was wanted for a domestic violence incident from a night or two before). No real problem there. But…then Searching Officer searches Defendant’s car, as their Department have a policy that requires officers to have a vehicle towed and inventoried when no one was present to take custody of it (which no one was). The officer finds a baton, and Defendant is ultimately convicted of possession of a baton.
Now, “Courts have recognized an exception to the warrant requirement when the police take ‘an inventory of the contents of a vehicle’ in the course of impounding it,” but that’s different than what happened here. And the law is the Police can’t use the inventory as a “pretext for searching a vehicle for contraband or other evidence.”
Here, Searching Officer testified it’s CHP policy “to have a vehicle such as defendant’s towed and inventoried when no one was present to take custody of it, it was standard procedure to fill out a CHP 180” to list items inventoried.
However, there were problems with Searching Officer: “He did not testify that either he or Sergeant Reeves, or the two of them jointly, had decided to have defendant’s vehicle towed before he searched it. He did not testify that either of them arranged to tow the vehicle. And he testified that he did not know whether the vehicle was in fact towed or whether a CHP 180 form was ever prepared. He admitted he did not fill out a CHP 180 form, and no such form was offered in evidence by the prosecution, suggesting that no policy-compliant inventory search was ever completed.” Also, Searching Officer testified ‘[t]he vehicle had nothing to do with why I was there’ and that he had ‘nothing to do with this traffic stop or anything to do with the CHP-180 [form], if there was one filled out.’”
The Court holds this was a search and violated the 4th Amendment. The People did “not defend the search as a valid inventory search or otherwise contend it was constitutionally permissible” but argued Police would have found the baton eventually (the baton had a red handle sticking up between the center console and the driver’s seat). So they argued inevitable discovery, and the Court didn’t buy that either.
About me, San Diego DUI lawyer Eric Ganci:
I am an owner and DUI lawyer in San Diego with my own firm Ganci, Esq., A Professional Corporation. I am trained in blood testing for drugs and alcohol, trained on breath testing, and trained to train police on field sobriety tests. I have authored Thomson West Publications regarding DUI science and law, and am a founding member of the DUI Defense Lawyers Association, a national group.
I am recognized, after completing the required coursework and passing the certification exam, as a Lawyer-Scientist by the American Chemical Society, Chemistry and the Law division. I have been fortunate to be awarded many other awards, and you can see my full bio here.
I received my JD from Thomas Jefferson School of Law, my BA in Music Education from Northern Illinois University, and graduated from the Trial Lawyers College in 2013.
I have offices in San Diego and Vista (North County San Diego), and I represent persons arrested for DUI in all counties in San Diego.
Also, per California Rules of Professional Conduct, although I try to simply make them informative and entertaining, some persons may take it as a legal solicitation. It’s not, and it does not in any way form any kind of attorney-client relationship with whoever reads it.
Eric Ganci, Esq., DUI trial lawyer
GANCI, ESQ., APC
Downtown San Diego office:
350 10th Ave, Ste 1000
San Diego CA 92101
North County San Diego office:
950 Vista Village Dr
Vista, CA 92084
He earned his JD from Thomas Jefferson School of Law and his BA in Music Education from Northern Illinois University.
Latest posts by Eric Ganci (see all)
- Prosecutor threatening Defendant with perjury for testifying…is that improper? - September 11, 2019
- More case law whether Mental Health Diversion is retroactive: People v. Burns - August 26, 2019
- Does a warrantless blood draw on an unconscious DUI suspect violate the 4th Amendment? Mitchell v. Wisconsin - August 21, 2019